Film role: Director - Quentin Tarantino

Quentin Tarantino - Director role

A film director is a role in the creation of a film where the director has absolute authority over everyone working in the film and essentially lets them know how and what they should be doing for the creative aspect of the film production. Commonly referred to as the “boss” of the film production, the jobs for the control over the team overlap with the producer of a film in most circumstances. What’s different to note is that the producer is the one who has the authority to manage the finance and budget of the film to managing the logistics and hiring staff; ultimately all the assets and funds needed for the film are managed by the producer. However the film director may take on some of the responsibilities that the producer would have to undertake. The director of the film is the one who is responsible for the creative aspects for the films production. Aspects of the film production are: overseeing the cinematography that is in control by the camera operator, coaching the actors and directing them on the scene within the film, supervising the staff and telling them what to do on set, directing the shooting timetable, overseeing the technical aspects and interpreting the script to try and visualize it on set with the objective to recreate the narrative in reality.

Quentin Tarantino began his career in the film industry working as an independent film maker. His first independent films were an immense success with films as Reservoir Dogs, released in 1992 along with the famous film Pulp Fiction which was also released in the same decade, 1994, just two years after the release of his first successful film.  Both of these films were regarded as classics and were a cult hit at the time in Hollywood. Right after his first film was released (Reservoir Dogs), Tarantino immediately became a legend in the film industry due to how well the film had gathered critical acclaim and financially successful.

Tarantino’s films typically incorporate many characteristics in his work which are distinguishable from just watching the film without even knowing who directed it. This is Tarantino’s style, one can normally deduct who directed the film just from the characteristics alone. Tarantino’s films are characterized by satire, non-linear narrative structures, elements of neo-noir genres (Kill Bill 1 and 2) and a particular love for violence as to quote from the director himself “Violence is one of the most fun things to watch.”

However although Tarantino is a director, as stated some of his films he doesn’t direct but then the majority he is the director for and writes the films, while even fulfilling the role as an actor in a few films he’s worked on such as Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs and Kill Bill. 

Directors may also write up scripts for a film without the need for a writer in the production process, as the director can fulfil many roles single headedly.  Tarantino has demonstrated this as with the works of Pulp Fiction while working as an independent film maker. During the pre-production of the film, Tarantino in his thirties had written the script for pulp fiction in a “dozen school notebooks”, provided the script to the producer, Lawrence Bender, the notebook had also included at least nine thousand grammatical errors which would have had needed to been corrected by the typist of the film, Linda Chen. This is an example of how rigorous the script writing was and devoted Tarantino is to his role as a director and writer.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quentin_Tarantino_filmography

https://www.google.co.uk/search?safe=off&espv=2&q=quentin+tarantino+Quotes&sa=X&ved=0CK8BEIdbMB5qFQoTCP_5vuX-xsgCFUFOGgodOiEAFA&biw=1776&bih=855

http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2013/03/making-of-pulp-fiction-oral-history

BFI Trip

On the 7th of October, we went to go and watch six of the short films showcased at the BFI located in South Bank, London. As we got there I noticed that they have their own library right on the left side of where you can purchase tickets and also a free film cinema where anyone can watch films with practically no cost at all. I thought that was very intriguing but since it's free I didn't really think that the films they were showing were of a decent narrative and standard of quality. The seats in the British Film Institute were extremely comfortable and I never felt the need to stand up due to discomfort.


On the following day, 8th of October, we went to go see a full length film called Ayanda at the Cineworld cinema in Haymarket. The film is a romantic drama set in South Africa based around the life of a girl who lost her father and want's to persue her dream in the shadow of her desceased father. The seats in the cineworld cinema I found were uncomfortable and was really dissatisfied because it made me feel like I had the same experience as my local vue cinema located in the Croydon town centre.

SOFT VS WASP

SOFT vs WASP

Soft is a short film directed and written by Simon Ellis and is about a father who is forced to confront his fears at the worst possible time in front of his own son who he poses as a role model to. The film’s genre is social realism because of the many realistic aspects of society that occur during the film. Crime is also one of the genres due to youth delinquents causing terror to a vulnerable family. Themes that occur around this film are fear, anguish, hate, terror and humility. These themes are explored throughout the film and the director embraces them to create tension and a sense of unease for the viewer.

Wasp is also a short film however directed and written by another producer, Andrea Arnold, who has also directed another film in the same genre that’s extremely similar to Soft and Wasp; which is Fish Tank. Wasp is about a mother who lives in poverty, struggling to look after her children as a single parent. However an old potential lover enters her life, which forces her into a situation where she constantly has to choose the priority over him or her children. Both short films are very similar in regard to the genre of social realism and the reoccurring themes.

However what’s  to take note of is the technical and visual codes in wasp. The big difference in both films and what I especially liked is how the editor used the visual effects of the insects to create symbolism of how the children are no different than insects trying to survive off of food left over on the street. This technique was employed extremely well because it contrasts and teaches the audience how poor some people are in England. 

The Shawshank Redemption - Analysis

The Shawshank redemption is a superb film directed by Frank Darabont and written by Stephen King. What’s noticeable about this film is the writer is a famous author known for his globally successful books, with up to 350 million book copies sold worldwide. Back when the film was released in 1994, advertisements that would have had Stephen King’s name on them simply would have been a no-brainer for the public to watch. Hence this is why I contemplate the films outstanding success, for the reason being of Stephen King’s narrative for the film. The summary of the film introduces us to Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins), a sharp banker falsely sentenced to two life terms for the double-murder of his wife and the man she was cheating with. He’s sent to Shawshank State Prison in 1947 and the film revolves around his life from this point forward.

Taking into account the reoccurring events based around criminal activity and given that the film is set inside a prison, the obvious genre that the Shawshank redemption falls into is crime. This brings us into the themes of the film. I feel that the main theme that this film focuses around is ‘hope’ which ties into the religious themes this film inhabits due to all of the prisoners using the bible as a guidance on how to live and how the writer and director attempts to depict the protagonist as a false prophet looking for a miracle. Another theme explored is rehabilitation, as the film preaches forgiveness with its religious themes, I believe that it preaches second chances with is sociological themes. The film makes you adore and like the characters who are in fact criminals who have murdered innocent people, which makes us believe that people can be rehabilitated and actually teaches us a lesson to forgive as an example as we lead on with our own lives and may come across similar situations where someone has changed from a mistake they've once committed in their lives and learnt from that.

The use of religious themes is backed up by examples as the protagonist gathering convicted inmates to follow his guidance and look up to him, similar to the prophet Jesus and his twelve disciples. The character who dialogues the film, RED, also describes his escape from his jail cell as a miracle when stated earlier on in the film that it’s impossible to escape. Once Andy escapes the prison he’s seen travel through a sewage tunnel and once out, looks upon the sky in freedom while rain falls down on him, signifying hope and relates to the scene in the bible where Jesus calls upon God on the night before he is captured by the Roman soldiers. This also ironically relates to the resurrection of Jesus as they both finally become free after enduring similar yet different journeys in their life.

The narrative of this film is told in a oral narrative style, where the actor, Morgan Freeman who plays RED, provides dialogue/narrates throughout the film to recount a sequence of events, essentially telling the audience the life of the protagonist, Andy Dufresne’s sentence time in the prison. I believe that Stephen King, the writer, chose this method of telling the story because of how easy it makes the storytelling be and refrains from confusing the audience with the amount of time skips that occurs in the film.

Performance in this film is without flaw. Every actor who plays a character creates a strong personality that we can love but also hate.

I believe the only non-digetic sound in the Shawshank redemption is the narrators voice throughout the film and the punch sound effects in the scenes where Andy is being harassed and beaten up to engage in homosexual activity.

Most of the cinematography is used to express the various characters emotions and facial expressions using close up shots of the face. Close up and mid shots are very common in this film when a conversation is occurring because the photographer, Roger Deakins, wants the viewer to get to know the characters on the same level as the people they are conversing with. He does an excellent

job at this as it made me feel engaged during the film and feel sympathy for these characters even though having prior knowledge on their bad deeds when in turn should make you hate and resent them. Without the frequent use of close ups, it wouldn’t make the film feel as personal as it truly is.

Soft ANALYSIS w/ notes

Soft Analysis

Soft is a short film that tells a realistic drama about a group of delinquents harassing a family that doesn’t want to be burdened.  The plot mainly focuses around a father that is forced to confront his fears and tries to confront them in order to protect his son. The film was directed and written by Simon Ellis and released in 2007 with a budget estimated of 50,000. Considering the big budget for the short film, I suspect that this was a big contributing factor to the films success and without a doubt this film looks like it could’ve been produced on a lower budget due to the short length and video quality at times in the film. Soft has won numerous awards, most notably one BAFTA film award which goes to show how high standard this film is.

The many themes explored in this short film have a lot to do with fear, anger, anxiety and humility. Soft’s genre is fairly obvious to point out as it’s social realism with drama as it focuses around what occurs in the majority of peoples everyday life. Throughout the film, there are many scenes in which it leaves the audience feeling tense, always on edge about what’s upcoming. Tension is a huge part of this film as it keeps us engaged and leads to shocking events such as when the father’s son strikes the delinquents in the head with a baseball bat.

The cinematography in Soft is outstanding as it is used to depict different perspectives throughout the whole film. The aspect ratio and quality of resolution always changes constantly when the camera focuses on either of the two different social groups. I feel that the director had used this technique to give an insight to the audience on the huge gap in the quality of life from the delinquents and the father and son, this is a good representation of how these people live and generates a view of what life is like between lower class people and people from a middle class standpoint. 

Get off my land ANALYSIS

The short film titled “Get off my land” is a film about a presumed couple exploring the countryside but intruding on a man’s property, hence the title. We, the audience, gather the assumption that the man and the woman who are the main protagonists of the short film are a couple, judging from how comfortable they are together while arguing and how the man always tries to lighten the mood while she’s annoyed. I believe that the film is actually set in the countryside however one could also argue that the setting could be near or in someone’s farm due to the gate that they both try to get through. If it was a normal park or countryside then you would be able to easily unlock the gate due to the gate being intended for humans to use; the gate we see here resembles one that’s used to prevent animals from getting out the farm, therefore we can presume that the film is being shot in the antagonists’ farm.

The mise en scene in this film provides the audience with a lot of information as to who is acting what role and how what we see creates meaning and supplies us with knowledge on why it’s there such as the props or the costumes for example. From what we notice from the first clip of the short film, the woman is wearing boots and suitable trousers walking through the mud. Then we see the man behind her, who is wearing casual clothing (jeans and shoes), has a lot of trouble even just walking across the muddy ground. This supports my theory as evidence as to how the couple might have had an argument even before they might have reached the muddy plains, that is the major difference in clothing. This also broadens our view on who must have been the right one from the conflict between the two; assuming the woman is wearing the right clothing for the trip and the man is wearing the wrong unsuitable clothing. Just judging from what the characters are wearing, the audience can notice what type of personalities these characters have. From just the clip where the man dusts off the mud from his jeans, we immediately know that the character is impatient and believes he’s rough from what we can tell from his body language. The woman walks straight forward across the mud which indicates that she’s tired of him and suggests she knows what she’s doing, the positioning of the characters also creates meaning that they are currently unhappy with each other and shows us the conflict between the two.

The cinematography used in this short film is executed very well to present what’s happening in the film. The wide shot of the man trying to cross the gate is used to generate certain emotions such as making the audience feel awkward and confused that the man is struggling to cross this giant obstacle while the woman who we presume is his partner just looks and walks off in the distance. This shot makes the audience feel as how much he is trying to take an effort to initiate contact between the woman and makes us feel disgust as to how the woman is treating him. Without this wide shot we wouldn’t be able to understand what the director wants to convey to the audience and how the gate is used as a metaphor as to how big the next obstacle is going to become and is there as a warning  to how one shouldn’t trespass into someone else’s property.

I really liked how the director, Douglas Ray, employed the long shot camera technique right before the man and the woman engages communication with the antagonist in the jeep. The way Douglas had shot this scene; he places the camera onto the field and keeps the camera moving slightly unsteady. The reason why I admired this scene out of the whole short film was because of the effect that this shot gives off the audience. It made me feel as if someone is watching them from a far off distance, or how it reminds me of an animal disguised within the environment seeking its prey; the shot gives the effect of how they are being hunted.

What’s rather noticing is the jeep coming out from the trees in the big field. From this shot I realize that this type of vehicle is not one you would see in the city and if so, it would be a rare occurrence to see one. The vehicle is shown in the shot to show that they are not close to the city, and that the setting is far off from modern civilization.

The non-digetic sound in this film is used from the sound of the gun shots as they obviously couldn’t fire the gun on video. The second gun shot is edited into the film to foreshadow that the woman had been killed too, however the audience is left to theorize what actually happened so the death of the woman is not certain. As the gun shot is fired, we see an extreme long shot of birds flying out of the trees. This symbolizes death as animals are frightened of loud noises, with the addition of the birds being crows which is a symbolism for bad luck. 

Ralph analysis

Ralph

In ‘Ralph’ the first scene we see is the character stepping off the train. The camera shot is distinctively obvious as it’s a long shot. In addition, the character, Ralph, is significantly smaller in size compared to the many other objects around him such as the vehicles and the current setting. This tells us that at first glance Ralph is a tourist who is lost and trying to navigate to a location that he is unsure about.  At times the jitter cam is often used in scenes where Ralph is in a conversation with someone or unsure about what to do. Using this technique, it gives us the audience the implication that Ralph is at unease because everyone is different around him and is in disarray due to the fact that he can’t find the person he’s looking for. This also adds realism to the film as it seems as if we, the audience are there with him.

The props in the mis’en scene actually have a deep role that relates to the actor in the short film. Normally when people try to call other people, they use a fairly small mobile phone for contact. However in this short film the director chose to use a pay phone with a phone that was much bigger than usual. I could say that the director chose to use this because Ralph is in dire need of help and because he has a big problem, the phone is meant to empower how big his situation currently is. The editing in this film is minimal, but works well in terms of when each scene is cut. This doesn’t make it seem like the clip order is random which would confuse the audience; the camera shot order is executed very well. In the short film, Ralph seems to constantly go through a continuity of problems throughout his fairly short journey while in France. Ralph has a pen and paper with him, which he uses to write down a series of telephone numbers in order to try and get into contact with his lost friend. This signifies how much of a problem his struggle is and how much he is willing to go through in order to achieve it.

During the film, most of the characters are speaking a foreign language, which leaves the audience baffled as to what’s going on and what’s being said. However this is also used to our advantage as it leaves it up to us to decide what’s going on and what is going to happen further on in the film. This also applies to when Ralph sometimes doesn’t make any speeches in reply to others trying to talk to him in a different language. This makes it quite exciting to watch and keeps us occupied as it leaves it up to us to decide whether he’s going to catch up with Clare or not.

There are many themes that occur such as him being lost, confusion, despair, love and jealousy to name a few. All these themes link up with one another to help us focus about the plot of the film. However it’s quite difficult for the average person to try and notice what genre the film is from first glance. In my opinion, I’d say this is an Adventure film due to the adventure the main character Ralph is having, with various other elements such as suspense, anxiety and being self aware of his surroundings.

The ending of the film is surprisingly very well executed, as it includes a plot twist to when Ralph finally meets the person he has been meaning to contact, but rather has made short contact with another woman and chooses to disregard all that hard work in order to try and find the character ‘Clare’ and just go off with the woman he just met.