Tuesday 20 October 2015

The Selfish Giant Analysis

The Selfish Giant is a British film directed by Clio Barnard and written by Oscar Wilde. The script is based off of Oscar Wilde’s story ‘The Happy Prince and Other Tales’ which is a collection of stories intended for children. Five stories are included in his book, one titled the same title of this film; The Selfish Giant. This is the source of narrative that Clio has re-written and reimagined for his own version which is the film itself. The film had been produced by the British Film Institute known as the BFI, Film4 and Moonspun films. The box office total in the opening weekend amounted to $132,128 in the United Kingdom. The genre that this film falls into is social realism because of the focus on the topical issues alive in our modern day society which include poverty and showcase the lives of the lower working class people. Themes present in this film revolve around money, exploitation, friendship, grief, poverty, family and crime.  The themes in this film are emphasized by the ongoing friendship between the two friends especially judging from their similar lower class living standards and their outlook on how life is all about earning money.

From watching the film from the audience's persepective, we can presume that the working class people in this film are part of the lower class group due to substandard housing from what we can tell when Swiftys mother is approached by bailiffs for insufficient funds, rescued by her son with the little amount of money he earned from scrap dealing. Arbor falls into the lower class families as well evident from how he tries to act as a fatherly figure in his family by working the same job as Swifty to earn money for his mother alongside all of the brothers sleeping on the sofas in the living room instead of having their own bedrooms. The clothing that Arbor wears is a worn out tracksuit which is a cheap choice of clothing that suggests how poor the mother is and how contempt the protagonist is at wearing this style of clothing. The bullying from the students that pass his house and describe the housing as it being unappealing also implies the difference in social status and indirectly lets the audience understand the social hierarchy within the film; the protagonist being at the bottom.

The narrative structure to the film features a linear storyline which makes it easy for the audience to follow and not get confused how the story proceeds. The Selfish Giant tells the tragic tale of two boys, Arbor and Swifty who have the mindset that school is a burden to succession and disregards it out the way with the motive to earn money as a scrapper, searching for wires and scrap metal with the aim to earn money to support the ones they hold dearest.  The immaturity of the protagonist’s behavior, Arbor, leads the film to a direction of insightful events.  The two boys become involved with ‘the selfish giant’ himself, named Kitten, who is a potentially violent middle-aged man who exploits the boys in order to earn some additional money. However this character is also like a double edged sword. The way Kitten’s character is acted out makes it seem as he’s a fatherly figure to Swifty and Arbor meanwhile on the other hand he’s a selfish aggressive man who uses kids to exploit them for money.

There is an underlying contrast between Arbor and Swifty as they both come from different but similar families with the only similarity being part of a dysfunctional family and belonging to a lower class social group. Both of their intentions are to work and financially benefit both of their own families but --- The rebellious nature of Arbor who has the tendency to make mistakes without realizing them due to the bad influences around him causes him to make hasty decisions and drag close ones into them. Swifty is relatable to this as he comes from a lower class family too however he actually has a father who is a compulsive drinker and steals all the money he can get his hands on to buy alcohol satisfying his own selfish needs.  

Often in the film the director chooses to include a lot of establishing shots of animals and wide landscapes before a new scene is introduced. This gives off the effect to refresh the audience’s emotional state and is presented normally after a scene has ended. Additionally the shots provide hints to foreshadow what’s going to occur through the next scene after the establishing shot. Shots of the huge piles of scrap in the scrapyard with the children digging into it resembles slaves working for privileged men trying their best to earn ‘scraps’ of money in order to survive while also is there as a metaphor of how the big future they have is just going to become one big pile of scrap.

The performance is amazingly acted out as the protagonist (Connor Chapman) who is only a child makes the audience grow an attachment to the character as how he’s always deciding on improper and unsuitable motives that give us the urge to try and let Arbor know what he’s doing wrong in order to prevent those mistakes. Kitten’s character is also acted out in a manner of provoking the audience to cause hatred towards him and despise the man, especially in the scene where he threatens to mutilate Arbor’s hand on one of the machines at the scrapyard; this dramatic scene infuriates the audience which is a superb sign of excellent acting. I felt that the performance of the scene where Swifty dies from electrocution is executed poorly and could have been done in a more dramatic way in where the audience would feel grief and sorrow from the characters death. Furthermore the reaction to Swifty’s death from Arbors point of view in the film left a bit of distaste personally because of how he never even showed signs of agony immediately after his death (tears, pain and suffering). This only occurred after the scene had finished and once he left the death scene with his horse. However one could argue that this is because of how Arbor’s personality and behavior is meant to be portrayed due to him having gone through so much emotional situations within his own family, it could be a sign that he’s built up confidence.



Monday 19 October 2015

Otherwise Engaged Analysis

From the beginning of Otherwise Engaged, the long shot of the two protagonists of the film are seen to what seems to be exercising right outside the city (shown behind them due to the long shot). The technical codes shown here in this shot implies the struggle of how hard it is to attempt to escape the control the media has on you and the huge city presenting how tremendous the impact of the digital world has on the people while also depicting how large the influence the media has over the public. Additionally, we get the same type of shot displaying the woman doing star jumps facing the city, essentially facing backwards from where she came from. The technical codes here, as well as the performance enacted, implies how she wants everyone to notice her and is always seeking attention; giving the audience the thought that she has the urge to shout “look at me!” while jumping for attention. This show’s how childish her character is from the start and gives us an insight into what kind of character we are dealing with.

The mid shot of when the man attempts to propose for marriage on his knees with the phone in the shot is significant because the phone out of focus represents how she cares more about her mobile phone and what other people are doing in their lives, coming back to the two shot of the couple, this shows the lack of affection and attention she has solely concentrated on her partner himself, when in reality she should have her eyes fixed onto her partner instead of her phone which suggests the lack of interest also how the relationship is more focused on her and the mobile phone than with her partner. It’s almost like her eyes are the camera lens, hence she is constantly looking through the camera during the most important moments of her life. The performance of the film also emphasizes this when the man asks his partner while proposing, “Should I look into the camera?”, as if to discretely imply to the audience that his girlfriend is actually a digital device and how the facial expressions he makes shows how mentally exhausted he is about this.

The acting is really well performed as the film makes us laugh and the director portrays the film in such a way where we don’t really take it so seriously due to the comedic elements but reinforces how immature the woman is about the relationship with the aim to make us tense and displeased about their relationship during certain scenes within the film. The actors try to represent how modern day couples act which makes the acting within this film feel natural to the audience because most of us who are in a relationship can relate and laugh about the characters weaknesses and insecurities that’s displayed in the scene after the man puts on the ring on his partners finger and as they go to take a ‘selfie’, she complains about how fat and sweaty she looks when in reality she should be enjoying the moment.

The mise en scene for instance the costumes/outfits that both the protagonists are wearing gives us the impression that they’re comfortable seeing each other in this manner and also indicates how long they’ve been in a relationship together before the man states how they met in fresher’s week. The lighting is natural lighting from the daylight weather as I believe Alicia’s motive with the film was to portray it as natural as she could in order for it to create a connection with the audience.
The irony used by the woman when she responds to her partner after he asks “Should we tell our parents about this?” she replies with “Can’t we just enjoy the moment?” This is really humorous because the woman is contradicting herself as she’s not theoretically enjoying the actual moment at hand since she’s fixated on her phone than rather her boyfriend. It’s really ironic due to how the audience feels that he displays certain actions such as frowns and huffs in exasperation while he wants to express how much he wants her to actually enjoy herself rather than using her phone as a means of enjoyment.


The sound within this film was of majority digetic sound as it was mostly dialogue by the couple. The only non-digetic sounds in the film was the sound effects of when they were typing on their phone and the camera snap effect to when they took pictures on their phone. Also, notification sounds were included in the non-digetic category.

The Breakfast Club: Film Sheet

COULSDON COLLEGE: MEDIA TEXT INFORMATION SHEET
TITLE:
The Breakfast Club


YEAR OF PROD:
1985
TYPE:
FILM
X
TELEVISION
DOC.

MUSIC


ADVERT


MUSIC VID.
OTHER:

DIRECTOR

John Hughes
PRODUCER
John Hughes
Ned Tanen
Michelle Manning
WRITER
John Hughes
PRODUCTION COMPANY
A&M Films
Channel Productions
Universal Pictures
KEY CAST
/ARTIST
Emilio Estevez, Judd Nelson, Molly Ringwald, Ally Sheedy, Paul Gleason and Anthony Michael Hall
KEY CREW


GENRE
Comedy
Sub-genres: Romance
BUDGET
$1,000,000
BOX OFFICE
$38,100,000
THEMES
Love, happiness and sadnesss.

AWARDS
MTV Movie Silver Bucket of Excellence Award  - Judd Nelson and Anthony Michael Hall.

NARRATIVE:
The narrative for this film is a linear narrative structure. The narrative follows five high school students from Shermer High School in Illinois, USA, who have been sentenced to detention on a Saturday weekend for nine hours. All five students have nothing in common with different personalities that one would find extraordinary to see them associate themselves with each other.  As stated by Andrew Clark at the end of the film before the credits, “each one of us is an athlete (Andrew), a basket case (Allison), a princess (Claire),  a criminal (John) and a brain (which is Brian). During the detention they are tasked with writing a one thousand word essay issued from Mr. Vernon who is the school principal. However the delinquent John forces all four of the teenagers to communicate with each other by initiating conversations through arguments which strings them together and leads to laughing about it and getting along with each other while causing havoc in the school.  

























KEY SCENES:
The key scenes to this film are when the delinquent tries to trigger the Mr. Vernon’s anger due to how he removes the locket from his heavy wooden door next to the detention room which prevents the principal from keeping a good eye on the five teenagers. This action provides the audience with great insight into the principals personality as by viewing how the principal treats the students after this incident in turn suggests that the principal is no better than the delinquent John, because of how the principal bullies the students and shows hostility within the character and how he thinks about himself with such greed. From this first scene we can deduct that Mr. Vernon is the antagonist of the film; not the delinquent John.

Other key scenes are when each individual protagonist explains their backstory to the other characters; this creates an emotional attachment to the characters so the audience can inhabit a better understanding of them.

Ending scenes when each protagonist leaves the detention/school we get to see how they live their lives from then on. Each of them all seem different to when they first came into detention which leaves a positive impact on the audience as we know what they’re all enjoying themselves more from when they started and generates an idea that the students had learnt their lesson from being in detention, however not through the teachers guidance, but from their own. David Bowie’s quote at the beginning of the film in the credits further emphasises this to quote “And these children that you spit on as they try to change their worlds; are immune to your consultations, they are quite aware of what they are going through."

















COMPARABLES:


PROGRESSION OF KEY CONTRIBUTORS:
Universal Productions has gone on to producing thousands of award winning films since 1985 and has since become a distributor and a special effects company.

A&M Films had only produced films up until 1996.











ANY OTHER BUSINESS?










Friday 16 October 2015

Film role: Director - Quentin Tarantino

Quentin Tarantino - Director role

A film director is a role in the creation of a film where the director has absolute authority over everyone working in the film and essentially lets them know how and what they should be doing for the creative aspect of the film production. Commonly referred to as the “boss” of the film production, the jobs for the control over the team overlap with the producer of a film in most circumstances. What’s different to note is that the producer is the one who has the authority to manage the finance and budget of the film to managing the logistics and hiring staff; ultimately all the assets and funds needed for the film are managed by the producer. However the film director may take on some of the responsibilities that the producer would have to undertake. The director of the film is the one who is responsible for the creative aspects for the films production. Aspects of the film production are: overseeing the cinematography that is in control by the camera operator, coaching the actors and directing them on the scene within the film, supervising the staff and telling them what to do on set, directing the shooting timetable, overseeing the technical aspects and interpreting the script to try and visualize it on set with the objective to recreate the narrative in reality.

Quentin Tarantino began his career in the film industry working as an independent film maker. His first independent films were an immense success with films as Reservoir Dogs, released in 1992 along with the famous film Pulp Fiction which was also released in the same decade, 1994, just two years after the release of his first successful film.  Both of these films were regarded as classics and were a cult hit at the time in Hollywood. Right after his first film was released (Reservoir Dogs), Tarantino immediately became a legend in the film industry due to how well the film had gathered critical acclaim and financially successful.

Tarantino’s films typically incorporate many characteristics in his work which are distinguishable from just watching the film without even knowing who directed it. This is Tarantino’s style, one can normally deduct who directed the film just from the characteristics alone. Tarantino’s films are characterized by satire, non-linear narrative structures, elements of neo-noir genres (Kill Bill 1 and 2) and a particular love for violence as to quote from the director himself “Violence is one of the most fun things to watch.”

However although Tarantino is a director, as stated some of his films he doesn’t direct but then the majority he is the director for and writes the films, while even fulfilling the role as an actor in a few films he’s worked on such as Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs and Kill Bill. 

Directors may also write up scripts for a film without the need for a writer in the production process, as the director can fulfil many roles single headedly.  Tarantino has demonstrated this as with the works of Pulp Fiction while working as an independent film maker. During the pre-production of the film, Tarantino in his thirties had written the script for pulp fiction in a “dozen school notebooks”, provided the script to the producer, Lawrence Bender, the notebook had also included at least nine thousand grammatical errors which would have had needed to been corrected by the typist of the film, Linda Chen. This is an example of how rigorous the script writing was and devoted Tarantino is to his role as a director and writer.









Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quentin_Tarantino_filmography
https://www.google.co.uk/search?safe=off&espv=2&q=quentin+tarantino+Quotes&sa=X&ved=0CK8BEIdbMB5qFQoTCP_5vuX-xsgCFUFOGgodOiEAFA&biw=1776&bih=855
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2013/03/making-of-pulp-fiction-oral-history

Wednesday 14 October 2015

BFI Trip

On the 7th of October, we went to go and watch six of the short films showcased at the BFI located in South Bank, London. As we got there I noticed that they have their own library right on the left side of where you can purchase tickets and also a free film cinema where anyone can watch films with practically no cost at all. I thought that was very intriguing but since it's free I didn't really think that the films they were showing were of a decent narrative and standard of quality. The seats in the British Film Institute were extremely comfortable and I never felt the need to stand up due to discomfort.


On the following day, 8th of October, we went to go see a full length film called Ayanda at the Cineworld cinema in Haymarket. The film is a romantic drama set in South Africa based around the life of a girl who lost her father and want's to persue her dream in the shadow of her desceased father. The seats in the cineworld cinema I found were uncomfortable and was really dissatisfied because it made me feel like I had the same experience as my local vue cinema located in the Croydon town centre.





























SOFT VS WASP

SOFT vs WASP



Soft is a short film directed and written by Simon Ellis and is about a father who is forced to confront his fears at the worst possible time in front of his own son who he poses as a role model to. The film’s genre is social realism because of the many realistic aspects of society that occur during the film. Crime is also one of the genres due to youth delinquents causing terror to a vulnerable family. Themes that occur around this film are fear, anguish, hate, terror and humility. These themes are explored throughout the film and the director embraces them to create tension and a sense of unease for the viewer.

Wasp is also a short film however directed and written by another producer, Andrea Arnold, who has also directed another film in the same genre that’s extremely similar to Soft and Wasp; which is Fish Tank. Wasp is about a mother who lives in poverty, struggling to look after her children as a single parent. However an old potential lover enters her life, which forces her into a situation where she constantly has to choose the priority over him or her children. Both short films are very similar in regard to the genre of social realism and the reoccurring themes.


However what’s  to take note of is the technical and visual codes in wasp. The big difference in both films and what I especially liked is how the editor used the visual effects of the insects to create symbolism of how the children are no different than insects trying to survive off of food left over on the street. This technique was employed extremely well because it contrasts and teaches the audience how poor some people are in England. 


Tuesday 13 October 2015

The Shawshank Redemption - Analysis


The Shawshank redemption is a superb film directed by Frank Darabont and written by Stephen King. What’s noticeable about this film is the writer is a famous author known for his globally successful books, with up to 350 million book copies sold worldwide. Back when the film was released in 1994, advertisements that would have had Stephen King’s name on them simply would have been a no-brainer for the public to watch. Hence this is why I contemplate the films outstanding success, for the reason being of Stephen King’s narrative for the film. The summary of the film introduces us to Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins), a sharp banker falsely sentenced to two life terms for the double-murder of his wife and the man she was cheating with. He’s sent to Shawshank State Prison in 1947 and the film revolves around his life from this point forward.

Taking into account the reoccurring events based around criminal activity and given that the film is set inside a prison, the obvious genre that the Shawshank redemption falls into is crime. This brings us into the themes of the film. I feel that the main theme that this film focuses around is ‘hope’ which ties into the religious themes this film inhabits due to all of the prisoners using the bible as a guidance on how to live and how the writer and director attempts to depict the protagonist as a false prophet looking for a miracle. Another theme explored is rehabilitation, as the film preaches forgiveness with its religious themes, I believe that it preaches second chances with is sociological themes. The film makes you adore and like the characters who are in fact criminals who have murdered innocent people, which makes us believe that people can be rehabilitated and actually teaches us a lesson to forgive as an example as we lead on with our own lives and may come across similar situations where someone has changed from a mistake they've once committed in their lives and learnt from that.

The use of religious themes is backed up by examples as the protagonist gathering convicted inmates to follow his guidance and look up to him, similar to the prophet Jesus and his twelve disciples. The character who dialogues the film, RED, also describes his escape from his jail cell as a miracle when stated earlier on in the film that it’s impossible to escape. Once Andy escapes the prison he’s seen travel through a sewage tunnel and once out, looks upon the sky in freedom while rain falls down on him, signifying hope and relates to the scene in the bible where Jesus calls upon God on the night before he is captured by the Roman soldiers. This also ironically relates to the resurrection of Jesus as they both finally become free after enduring similar yet different journeys in their life.
The narrative of this film is told in a oral narrative style, where the actor, Morgan Freeman who plays RED, provides dialogue/narrates throughout the film to recount a sequence of events, essentially telling the audience the life of the protagonist, Andy Dufresne’s sentence time in the prison. I believe that Stephen King, the writer, chose this method of telling the story because of how easy it makes the storytelling be and refrains from confusing the audience with the amount of time skips that occurs in the film.

Performance in this film is without flaw. Every actor who plays a character creates a strong personality that we can love but also hate.

I believe the only non-digetic sound in the Shawshank redemption is the narrators voice throughout the film and the punch sound effects in the scenes where Andy is being harassed and beaten up to engage in homosexual activity.


Most of the cinematography is used to express the various characters emotions and facial expressions using close up shots of the face. Close up and mid shots are very common in this film when a conversation is occurring because the photographer, Roger Deakins, wants the viewer to get to know the characters on the same level as the people they are conversing with. He does an excellent

job at this as it made me feel engaged during the film and feel sympathy for these characters even though having prior knowledge on their bad deeds when in turn should make you hate and resent them. Without the frequent use of close ups, it wouldn’t make the film feel as personal as it truly is.